Valerio

I built AttackerView for myself.

I'm a security researcher. I've spent eight years finding bugs in apps, writing proof-of-concept exploits, and figuring out how things break.

Over that time, I built up a collection of checks, scripts, and processes I ran on every target. Same order. Same tools. Every time.

So I automated it. Not for a client. For me. Running the same steps manually was boring, and I'm lazy.

Then I looked at what I'd built and realized something.

It's basically a security team that works for you.

It runs the same checks a researcher would. It shows you how one finding connects to the next, so you see the actual path an attacker would take. It monitors your app around the clock and tells you when something changes.

Except it doesn't email you asking for a payout.

The checks stay current because security research is literally what I do. When a new zero-day drops or a new technique shows up, I add the check. Not on a release schedule. When it matters.

Your own security team, without the headcount.

You get it for the price of a SaaS tool.